AIP Publishing LLC
AIP Publishing LLC
  • pubs.aip.org
  • AIP
  • AIP China
  • University Science Books
  • Resources
    • Researchers
    • Librarians
    • Publishing Partners
    • Topical Portfolios
    • Commercial Partners
  • Publications

    Find the Right Journal

    Explore the AIP Publishing collection by title, topic, impact, citations, and more.
    Browse Journals

    Latest Content

    Read about the newest discoveries and developments in the physical sciences.
    See What's New

    Publications

    • Journals
    • Books
    • Physics Today
    • AIP Conference Proceedings
    • Scilight
    • Find the Right Journal
    • Latest Content
  • About
    • About Us
    • News and Announcements
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Leadership
    • Contact
  • pubs.aip.org
  • AIP
  • AIP China
  • University Science Books

Time to Rethink Predicting Pandemic Infection Rates?

  • November 24, 2020
  • AIP Advances
  • News
Share:

From the Journal: AIP Advances

WASHINGTON, November 24, 2020 — During the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, Joseph Lee McCauley, a physics professor at the University of Houston, was watching the daily data for six countries and wondered if infections were really growing exponentially. By extracting the doubling times from the data, he became convinced they were.

This histogram of Germany shows that it peaked on 4/6/20 and partly reopened in April. The border with Austria remained closed except for work commuting. Borders were reopened 6/15/20, but masks were worn in German businesses into July. Germany did not decay to the level of 3/16/20 until 6/10/20, nearly three months later. CREDIT: Joseph Lee McCauley
This histogram of Germany shows that it peaked on 4/6/20 and partly reopened in April. The border with Austria remained closed except for work commuting. Borders were reopened 6/15/20, but masks were worn in German businesses into July. Germany did not decay to the level of 3/16/20 until 6/10/20, nearly three months later. CREDIT: Joseph Lee McCauley

Doubling times and exponential growth go hand in hand, so it became clear to him that modeling based on past infections is impossible, because the rate changes unforeseeably from day to day due to social distancing and lockdown efforts. And the rate changes differ for each country based on the extent of their social distancing.

In AIP Advances, from AIP Publishing, McCauley explains how he combined math in the form of Tchebychev’s inequality with a statistical ensemble to understand how macroscopic exponential growth with different daily rates arise from person-to-person disease infection.

“Discretized ordinary chemical kinetic equations applied to infected, uninfected, and recovered parts of the population allowed me to organize the data, so I could separate the effects of social distancing and recoveries within daily infection rates,” McCauley said.

Plateauing without peaking occurs if the recovery rate is too low, and the U.S., U.K., and Sweden fall into that category. Equations cannot be iterated to look into the future, because tomorrow’s rate is unknown until it unfolds.

“Modelers tend to misapply the chemical kinetic equations as SIR (Susceptible, Infectious, or Recovered) or SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious, or Recovered) models, because they are trying to generate future rates from past rates,” McCauley said. “But the past doesn’t allow you to use equations to predict the future in a pandemic, because social distancing changes the rates daily.”

McCauley discovered he could make a forecast within five seconds via hand calculator that is as good as any computer model by simply using infection rates for today and yesterday.

“Lockdowns and social distancing work,” said McCauley. “Compare Austria, Germany, Taiwan, Denmark, Finland, and several other countries that peaked in early April, with the U.S., U.K., Sweden, and others with no lockdown or half-hearted lockdowns — they’ve never even plateaued, much less peaked.”

He stresses that forecasting cannot foresee peaking or even plateauing. Plateauing does not imply peaking, and if peaking occurs, there is nothing in the data to show when it will happen. It happens when the recovery rate is greater than the rate of new infections.

“Social distancing and lockdowns reduce the infection rate but can’t cause peaking,” McCauley said. “Social distancing and recoveries are two separate terms within the daily kinetic rate equations.”

The implication of this work is that research money could be better spent than on expensive epidemic modeling.

“Politicians should know enough arithmetic to be given instruction on the implications,” McCauley said. “The effect of lockdowns and social distancing show up in the observed doubling times, and there is also a predicted doubling time based on two days, which serves as a good forecast of the future.”

###

For more information:
Larry Frum
media@aip.org
301-209-3090

Article Title

Pandemic infection rates are deterministic but cannot be modeled

Authors

Joseph Lee McCauley

Author Affiliations

University of Houston


AIP Advances

AIP Advances is a fully open access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal. It covers all areas of applied physical sciences. With its advanced web 2.0 functionality, the journal puts relevant content and discussion tools in the hands of the community to shape the direction of the physical sciences.

http://aipadvances.aip.org

Share:
  • Understanding the Utility of Plasmas for Medical Applications
  • Face Masks Slow Spread of COVID-19; Types of Masks, Length of Use Matter

Keep Up With AIP Publishing

Sign up for the AIP newsletter to receive the latest news and information from AIP Publishing.
Sign Up

AIP PUBLISHING

1305 Walt Whitman Road,
Suite 110
Melville, NY 11747
(516) 576-2200

Resources

  • Researchers
  • Librarians
  • Publishing Partners
  • Commercial Partners

About

  • About Us
  • Careers 
  • Leadership

Support

  • Contact Us
  • Terms Of Use
  • Privacy Policy

© 2025 AIP Publishing LLC
  • 𝕏